The reforms that were presented in the alcohol summer that were presented last summer – according to the then adviser, Rishi Sonak – were designed to simplify the “outdated, complex and full of historical abnormal cases.”
But according to UK wine traders and industry numbers – the opposite is true.
They claim that the new system of wine-scheduled for February 2025, after a transitional period of 18 months-has stopped the costs of wine importers and merchants and pay the edge of the edge of the cliff.
So what are the changes, and is the industry the right to feel upset?
Special tax case
The historical tax condition of wine and other wine products moved from beer and spiritual drinks. Until August 2023, most wine was still subject to a fixed tax rate – 297.57 pounds per hectter of the product.
Now, however, taxes will be imposed on all alcoholic products based on a liter of pure alcohol (LPA) in the final product. This means that the wine duty bill is now directly linked to its strength.
In theory, the changes are logical and are compatible with the government's declared goal to simplify the graphic system and reduce alcohol consumption.
However, the reality for wine – according to the wine and commercial spirits (WSTA) is “the oppositely opposite.”
This is because it means moving from one amount of fees paid on alcohol between 11.5-14.5 % ABV (which represents 85 % of the wine sold in the United Kingdom) to 30 different amounts due; The equivalent of each 0.1 % ABV between these strengths.
In practice, this wine can soon be any of the 2.45 pounds – 3.10 pounds per bottle, depending on ABV.
For beer and spirits producers, the concept of calculating and recording the amount of fees due based on ABV and its size instead of just the sound level is not new. Why should wine now commit to the same demands?
Alcohol by contrast in size in wine
The problem – according to wine makers, importers and sellers – is that wine is an agricultural product, which means that ABV is difficult to predict.
“We cannot predict or control weather, nor ABV is one of the wines we ask from all over the world, which can differ with every wine,” explains the CEO of Majestic John Colley.
It is located and this means that the SKUS wine number on the shelves of stores in the UK is estimated to exceed 100,000, much more than any other category for alcohol drinks.
The contrast in ABV is especially spread among smaller wine makers. The Chianti, which was made by the Tuscan factory owned by the family 12.5 % ABV one year, then 13.1 % the next day, depending on the conditions according to which the sangiovese grapes have grown from it.
Therefore, the UK wine dealer will need to import this Chianti to calculate and pay a different duty on every old, and perhaps – probably – sell it on the shelf at different prices. Then do the same again for every other wine that he buys, and re -calculate its duty every time it is calmed up in the old lands on the shelf.
For a small independent wine store that uses half of the employees and sells a hundred wine or so, this is a huge administrative burden. One – in the era of high costs and fragile consumer confidence – the difference between staying standing on his feet and getting out of work can be.
Even for a much larger company like Majestic, which runs more than 200 stores and sells more than 1500 different wines, the new system requires a great investment.
“We have serious doubts about whether the regulations required to manage the new tax system are possible to implement,” says Cole. “We are large enough as a business to bear the burden of cost and continue to trade, but it will affect our ability to invest in our growth plan, open new stores and employ more people.”
What happens when the intimidation of the wine duty ends?
The government apparently introduced knowledge of the effects of alcohol repair-an easement period where taxes are imposed on all wine between 11.5-14.5 % as if they were 12.5 % ABV.
However, when the hood ends in February 2025, the industry says that high prices are inevitable. The CEO of WSTA Miles Bell says its analysis shows that 43 % of wine will face an increase in the tax burden of next year, with mostly red wine.
Therefore, the industry numbers were pressure on the government very much. In a discussion in the Westminster Hall hosted by Governor MP Will Queens earlier this month, parliamentarians including Pretty Patel, Julian Stordi and Stephen McBerland participated in industry fears and urged the treasury to make the easement permanent.
“This seems to be a difficult situation with unintended consequences,” McBerland told his colleagues. “If the easement is scheduled to be permanent instead of temporary, this may lead to solving the problem.”
“This increases the red tape at a time when the government should do more to reduce the costs of business,” Patel added.
Such a step – industry numbers say – you will keep the principle of taxes on products based on the amount of alcohol in them, but without placing the administrative burden on importers and merchants to calculate the duty due to every wine they sell.
“The short -term solution is clear and simple in reality: make the wise easement always,” says Cole. “This will not only save companies from the additional cost, complexity and red tape, but it will prevent more inflation prices for consumers.”
Will the changes to the government cost?
However, it appears that the government is committed to following the Sonak policy. Gareth Davis, the treasury secretary, told the cabinet, for discussion, the easement was designed to give the “wine industry to adapt”, but he added that he was “confident that the bureaucratic burden under the new system can be controlled.”
This situation was met with mystery by the industry. Cole says the minister's comments show “the disturbing lack of understanding our sector.”
Meanwhile, Bell refers to the latest HMRC numbers for alcohol, which showed a loss of 436 million pounds in the receipts of the obligatory duty between September 2023 and January 2024 compared to the same period in 2022/23, where the alcoholic reforms strike the industrial evidence strongly.
“Consumers are more sensitive to increasing prices than the treasury takes in its expectations,” he says. “The focus has been starkly with a huge decrease in wine receipts after 20 % increased service in most wine last August.”
Therefore, the change in the government could be the best opportunity for the sector to reflect this policy, as it is already believed that the figures of industry were seeking a consultant under the work of Rachel Reeves before the general elections.
But with a date for the day of polling day that has not yet been appointed, and the end of Evertent is less than a year, wine companies have a little option to prepare for the worst.
$ (Document). 93DCB/Tags.js “) ;
